Assessment of indigenous surrogate microorganisms for UV disinfection dose verification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This study aimed to isolate waterborne heterotrophic organisms indigenous to water treatment processes with suitable ultraviolet (UV) dose–response profiles for estimation of the UV doses delivered by operational UV disinfection systems. The UV dose–response profiles of two isolated organisms, Flavobacterium succinicans and Sphingopyxis chilensis , were determined. S . chilensis has a UV dose–response with potential for use as an indigenous surrogate for Cryptosporidium inactivation, up to 2.2‐logs in the dose range 2–7 mJ/cm 2 of monochromatic UV light at 253.7 nm. F . succinicans was more sensitive and tailing was observed above 4 mJ/cm 2 making it unsuitable for UV dose verification above this dose. As a single species in the water samples used in this study, S . chilensis is unlikely to be present in sufficient numbers for routine use as an indigenous surrogate. However, the Sphingomonadaceae family to which it belongs is abundant in various drinking water sources and warrants further investigation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".