MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3160865497 · doi:10.2147/dmso.s288881

Development and Internal Validation of a Prognostic Model for 4-Year Risk of Metabolic Syndrome in Adults: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2021· article· en· W3160865497 on OpenAlexaff
Hui Zhang, Dandan Chen, Jing Shao, Ping Zou, Nianqi Cui, Leiwen Tang, Dan Wang, Zhihong Ye

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGout, Hyperuricemia, Uric Acid
Canadian institutionsNipissing University
FundersNational Office for Philosophy and Social SciencesNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBrier scoreMedicineRetrospective cohort studyLogistic regressionMetabolic syndromeCohortBody mass indexInternal medicineCohort studyReceiver operating characteristicPhysical therapyStatisticsObesity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: A prognostic prediction model for metabolic syndrome can help nurses or physicians evaluate the future individual absolute risk of MetS in order to develop personalized care strategies. We aimed to derive and internally validate a prognostic prediction model for 4-year risk of metabolic syndrome in adults. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in a tertiary care setting, and the dataset was obtained from the Healthcare Information and Management Systems of a tertiary hospital. The cohort included Chinese adults attending health examination from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2014. A total of 6793 participants without metabolic syndrome were included in the cohort and were followed up for 4 years. Available candidate predictors in the dataset were weight, MCV, MCH, AST, ALT, BMI, NGC, TC, serum uric acid, gender, smoking, WBC, LC, Hb, HCT, and age. A logistic regression model was adopted to build the risk equation, and bootstrapping was used when considering internal validation. Calibration, discrimination, and the clinical utility were calculated for the model's performance. RESULTS: Of the 6793 participants, 1750 participants were diagnosed with metabolic syndrome within 4 years. The developed prediction model contained 5 predictors (body mass index, age, total cholesterol, alanine transaminase, and serum uric acid). After internal validation, the C-statistic was 0.783 (95% CI, 0.772-0.795). Additionally, the current model had good calibration. Calibration slope was 0.995 (95% CI, 0.934-1.058), and calibration intercept was -0.008 (95% CI, -0.088-0.073). The Brier score was 0.156. The decision-curve analysis indicated that the prediction model provided greater net benefit than the default strategies of providing treatment or not providing treatment for all patients. CONCLUSION: A prognostic risk prediction model for determining 4-year risk of metabolic syndrome onset in adults was developed and internally validated. This model was based on routine clinical measurements that quantified individual future risk of metabolic syndrome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetes Metabolic Syndrome and ObesitySame topicGout, Hyperuricemia, Uric AcidFrench-language works237,207