MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3160900168 · doi:10.9778/cmajo.20200214

Management of severe frostbite with iloprost, alteplase and heparin: a Yukon case series

2021· article· en· W3160900168 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Alexander Poole, Josianne Gauthier, Mira MacLennan

Bibliographic record

VenueCMAJ Open · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBurn Injury Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityMcMaster University Medical CentreYukon UniversityUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrostbiteMedicineIloprostSurgeryAdverse effectAnesthesiaInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: We identified the need to modernize frostbite management in our northern centre and implemented a treatment protocol in 2015. Our aim was to describe the clinical course of patients presenting to the hospital since the implementation of the protocol. METHODS: This was a retrospective case series from Whitehorse General Hospital, Whitehorse, Yukon Territory, Canada. We reviewed the charts of patients who presented to the hospital with grade 2-4 frostbite and were treated as per our protocol between Feb. 9, 2015, and Feb. 8, 2020. Patients with grade 2-4 frostbite received iloprost; in addition, those with grade 4 frostbite received alteplase and heparin. We determined the number of digits affected and salvaged, and the time from presentation to the emergency department to treatment initiation. We also examined patients' demographic characteristics, predisposing events, frostbite severity and adverse drug reactions. RESULTS: In 22 patients treated for grade 2-4 frostbite, 142 digits were affected: 59 with grade 2 frostbite, 25 with grade 3 frostbite and 58 with grade 4 frostbite; of the 142, 113 (79.6%) were salvaged. All 29 digits amputated had grade 4 frostbite. The mean time from presentation to iloprost initiation was reduced from 32.9 hours in 2015 to 3.0 hours in 2020. Sports (10 cases [45%]) and alcohol use (6 [27%]) were the most common precipitating events, with alcohol use tending to result in more severe injury (grade 4 in 5 of 6 cases). Adverse reactions with iloprost (e.g., headache) were common but mild. Adverse reactions with alteplase (e.g., bleeding) were less common but of greater clinical significance. INTERPRETATION: Over the study period, our protocol contributed to improvement in frostbite care at our institution, resulting in a digit salvage rate comparable to other published results. Our 5-year experience shows that advanced medical care of frostbite can be achieved, even at a rural centre.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.993
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCMAJ OpenSame topicBurn Injury Management and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207