MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3160943001

Design of a Retractable Inlet Cover

2014· article· en· W3160943001 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Scott Entz, Hishaam Peerbuccus, Paul Rydberg, Prince Soriano

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat Transfer and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInletCover (algebra)Environmental scienceGeologyEngineeringOceanographyMechanical engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this project is to design a retractable cover that can prevent snow and ice from entering the inlet of a 25 foot diameter bell-mouth at the Global Aerospace Center for Icing and Environmental Research (GLACIER) Testing Facility in Thompson, Manitoba. The client is MDS AeroTest and the design team (Team 8 – OmegaTech) is comprised of four undergraduate students from the University of Manitoba’s Faculty of Mechanical Engineering. Team OmegaTech have used their collective engineering skill and experience developed over the past 4-5 years of education and related internship experience to design a fully functioning, retractable cover, which will be operable by one person. In addition to keeping snow out of the bell mouth and being retractable, the design must be safe, structurally stable and operable by a single person. No components may be in front of the bell-mouth when the cover is retracted in order maintain the quality of inlet airflow when testing. The retractable cover must be easily portable and cannot consume track space during the summer testing season. The cover must be durable, reliable, preserve the standards of the current testing and maintenance operations and not exceed $200,000 in cost. OmegaTech has developed a preliminary design to prevent the ingress of snow into the bell-mouth driven by the needs developed by our team and the client. Our team’s design consists of a 22 oz. vinyl-polyester tarp that deploys downward through a set of retractable guides and covers the entire bell-mouth inlet. Remote operation of a variable frequency drive motorized roller allows for simple retraction and deployment of the tarp from a housing cart located above of the bell-mouth. A variable frequency drive motor is also used to power the cart housing, which may be suspended either in front of the bell-mouth when deployed, or completely behind the plane of the bell- mouth inlet when retracted. The cart moves along a set of tracks that are permanently fixed behind the bell-mouth. The tracks are mounted under a support structure that surrounds the bell-mouth and attaches to the steel members supporting the bell-mouth, facilitating portability of […]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.858
Threshold uncertainty score0.298

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.166
Teacher spread0.154 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)Same topicHeat Transfer and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207