Self-Supervised Speech Enhancement for Arabic Speech Recognition in Real-World Environments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mobile speech recognition attracts much attention in the ubiquitous context, however, background noises, speech coding, and transmission errors are prone to corrupt the incoming speech. Therein, building a robust speech recognizer requires the availability of a large number of real-world speech samples. Arabic language, like many other languages, lacks such resources; to overcome this limitation, we propose a speech enhancement step, before the recognition begins. For the speech enhancement purpose, we suggest the use of a deep autoencoder (DAE) algorithm. A two-step procedure is suggested: in the first step, an overcomplete DAE is trained in an unsupervised way, and in the second one, a denoising DAE is trained in a supervised way leveraging the clean speech produced in the previous step. Experimental results performed on a real-life mobile database confirmed the potentials of the proposed approach and show a reduction of the WER (Word Error Rate) of a ubiquitous Arabic speech recognizer. Further experiments show an improvement of the perceptual evaluation of speech quality (PESQ), and the short-time objective intelligibility (STOI) as well.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".