MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3161007268

УКРАЇНСЬКЕ «НАЦІОНАЛЬНЕ ВІДРОДЖЕННЯ» (НАЦІОТВОРЕННЯ) В ГАЛИЧИНІ ХІХ – початку ХХ ст. У ЗАРУБІЖНІЙ ІСТОРІОГРАФІЇ

2013· article· uk· W3161007268 on OpenAlex
Ігор Райківський

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogy · 2013
Typearticle
Languageuk
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEastern European Communism and Reforms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUkrainianHistoriographyNational consciousnessNational QuestionDiasporaNationalismPoliticsPolitical scienceHistoryNational identitySociologyLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Foreign scholars have made a substantial contribution to the study of the Ukrainian National Movement, their works, however, for the most part remained unavailable in Ukraine until the early 1990s. The purpose of the article is to reveal the main achievements of foreign historians in the study of the formation of Ukrainian national and political consciousness in Galicia throughout the 19th – the beginning of the 20th centuries, which is traditionally covered in native historiography as the Age of National Revival. Among foreign researchers (German, Austrian, British, and others), Polish and Russian historiographers, as well as diaspora scholars, took the greatest interest in the Ukrainian National Movement. The distinctive feature of many publications is a manifold picture of historical writing, reflecting consideration of national and political preferences: from traditional positivist to modernist approaches. Diaspora historians of the older generation advocated primordialist approach, according to which the paramount goal of the Ukrainian historical process is the formation of the nation state. The works of Polish and Russian historians, who eschewed comparative studies of national problems, were characterized by excessive subjectivity, the attitude towards the Ukrainian National Movement remained explicitly critical up to the mid-20th century (in some works – up to now). In modern Western historiography, including diaspora studies, in line with current scientific theories of nation and nationalism, the Ukrainian National Movement is regarded in the light of the consolidation of national consciousness, cross-influenced by Austrophile, Polonophile, Russophile, and in fact Ukrainophile orientations. Among the publications of Western scholars of the late 20th and early 21st centuries, the process of «national revival» (nation-building in the modern period) in Austrian Galicia is especially foregrounded in the works of Canadian scholars J.-P. Himka and P.-R. Magocsi, American scholar R. Szporluk, German and Austrian researchers A.-V. Wendland, A. Kappeler, M. Moser, and others. Their studies gave impetus to reconsider the political history of the land, in particular the National Movement in native post-Soviet historiographical literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.751
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.011
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0060.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it