MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3161012488 · doi:10.37193/cjm.2012.01.04

New models of the generalized fixed-charge network design problem

2012· article· en· W3161012488 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCarpathian Journal of Mathematics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Parking Systems Research
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFixed chargeInteger programmingMathematical optimizationInteger (computer science)Network planning and designClass (philosophy)Charge (physics)Computer scienceMathematicsArtificial intelligenceComputer networkPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider in this paper the generalized fixed-charge network design (GFCND) problem in which we are interested to find the cheapest backbone network connecting exactly one hub from each of the given clusters. The GFCND problem belongs to the class of generalized combinatorial optimization problems. We describe two mixed integer programming formulations of the GFCND problem. Based on one of the new proposed formulations, we solve the GFCND problem to optimality using CPLEX for problems with up to 30 clusters and 200 nodes. Computational results are reported and compared with those from the literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.636
Threshold uncertainty score0.415

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it