MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3161050228 · doi:10.21423/aabppro20015262

Impact of Gastrointestinal Nematodes in Lactating Cattle

2001· article· en· W3161050228 on OpenAlexaff
Ane Nødtvedt, Ian R. Dohoo, Javier Sánchez, Gary Conboy, Greg Keefe, Luc DesCôteaux, K.E. Leslie, John Campbell

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Association of Bovine Practitioners Conference Proceedings · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicHelminth infection and control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of GuelphUniversité de MontréalUniversity of Prince Edward Island
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPastureAnthelminticGrazingBiologyNematodeOstertagia ostertagiCattle DiseasesAnimal scienceVeterinary medicineAgronomyZoologyMedicineEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The importance of gastrointestinal parasites in young cattle on pasture is well established, with clinical signs of nematode infestations commonly observed during the animals' first grazing season. The impact of these parasites in mature animals is less certain. Adult cows with exposure to pasture will harbour worms, but will usually not display the clinical signs seen in younger stock. There is, however, some evidence of increased milk production in lactating animals following anthelmintic treatment.1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.629

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Association of Bovine Practitioners Conference ProceedingsSame topicHelminth infection and controlFrench-language works237,207