MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3161056544 · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23023-0

Silica-copper catalyst interfaces enable carbon-carbon coupling towards ethylene electrosynthesis

2021· article· en· W3161056544 on OpenAlexafffund
Jun Li, Adnan Ozden, Mingyu Wan, Yongfeng Hu, Fengwang Li, Yuhang Wang, Reza R. Zamani, Dan Ren, Ziyun Wang, Yi Xu, Dae‐Hyun Nam, Joshua Wicks, Bin Chen, Xue Wang, Mingchuan Luo, Michaël Grätzel, Fanglin Che, Edward H. Sargent, David Sinton

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Communications · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicCO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
Canadian institutionsCanadian Light Source (Canada)University of SaskatchewanUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOffice of ScienceArgonne National LaboratoryUniversity of Texas at AustinCanadian Light SourceCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchUniversity of TorontoMassachusetts Green High Performance Computing CenterU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsCatalysisEthyleneElectrosynthesisElectrolysisCarbon fibersMaterials scienceEthylene oxideChemical engineeringCopperFaraday efficiencyInorganic chemistryElectrodeChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic chemistryMetallurgyElectrolyteComposite numberPhysical chemistryComposite materialPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Membrane electrode assembly (MEA) electrolyzers offer a means to scale up CO2-to-ethylene electroconversion using renewable electricity and close the anthropogenic carbon cycle. To date, excessive CO2 coverage at the catalyst surface with limited active sites in MEA systems interferes with the carbon-carbon coupling reaction, diminishing ethylene production. With the aid of density functional theory calculations and spectroscopic analysis, here we report an oxide modulation strategy in which we introduce silica on Cu to create active Cu-SiOx interface sites, decreasing the formation energies of OCOH* and OCCOH*—key intermediates along the pathway to ethylene formation. We then synthesize the Cu-SiOx catalysts using one-pot coprecipitation and integrate the catalyst in a MEA electrolyzer. By tuning the CO2 concentration, the Cu-SiOx catalyst based MEA electrolyzer shows high ethylene Faradaic efficiencies of up to 65% at high ethylene current densities of up to 215 mA cm−2; and features sustained operation over 50 h.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations182
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature CommunicationsSame topicCO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsFrench-language works237,207