Attention-based Selection Strategy for Weakly Supervised Object Localization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Weakly Supervised Object Localization (WSOL) task aims to recognize the object position by using only image-level labels. Some previous techniques remove the most discriminative parts for all input images or random images to capture the entire object location. However, these methods can not perform the correct operation on different images such as hiding the data or feature maps that should not be hidden. In this case, both classification and localization accuracy will be affected. Meanwhile, just erasing the most important regions tends to make the model learn the less discriminative parts from outside of the objects. To address these limitations, we propose an Attention-based Selection Strategy (ASS) method to choose images that do need to be erased. Moreover, we use different threshold self-attention maps to reduce the impact of unhelpful information in one of the branches of our selection strategy. Based on our experiments, the proposed method is simple but effective to improve the performance of WSOL. In particular, ASS achieves new state-of-the-art accuracy on CUB-200-2011 dataset and works very well on ILSVRC 2016 dataset.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".