MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3161190754

Enchanted Suffering: Queer Magick as Educated Hope

2021· article· en· W3161190754 on OpenAlexaff
Jasper Jay Bryan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTheological Perspectives and Practices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQueerUtopiaHermeneuticsPower (physics)SociologySpace (punctuation)Gender studiesAestheticsArtEpistemologyArt historyPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Is there magick in suffering? Moreover, how can an enchanted worldview assist care providers in expanding horizons of hope for their clients, patients, congregations, or communities? Using a magickal hermeneutics, case studies of self-identified “queer witches” have much to teach us about hope. Following Jose Esteban Munoz's conception of Queer Utopia and Ernst Bloch's docta spes, these individuals demonstrate a hope that is rooted in adversity, tended by enchantedness. As spiritual care providers, we can learn to purposefully integrate magickal principles into our work with marginalized individuals, and all of those who are experiencing suffering. We can hold magickal space---an enchanted, educated utopia---to cultivate our clients’ inner power and expand horizons of hope.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.927
Threshold uncertainty score0.962

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTheological Perspectives and PracticesFrench-language works237,207