Histogram of Marked Background (HMB) Feature Extraction Method for Arabic Handwriting Recognition
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Features extraction is one of the most important steps in handwriting recognition systems. In this paper, we propose a novel features extraction method, which is adapted to the complex nature of Arabic handwriting. The proposed feature called histogram of marked background (HMB) is not considering only ink pixels in a text image, but also uses the background of the image. Each background pixel in the text image was marked according to the repartition of ink pixels in its neighborhood. Feature vectors are extracted by computing histograms from the marked images. Hidden Markov models (HMMs) with Hidden Markov model toolkit (HTK) were used in the recognition process. The experiments were performed on two datasets: IBN SINA database of historical Arabic documents and Isolated Farsi Handwritten Character Database (IFHCDB). The proposed feature in this study produced efficient and promising results for Arabic handwriting recognition, for both isolated characters and for historical documents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it