MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3161227694 · doi:10.11575/cdm.v16i1.70710

Symmetric association schemes arising from abstract regular polytopes

2020· article· en· W3161227694 on OpenAlexaff
Alyeah Alsairafi, Allen Herman

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Calgary · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
Topicsemigroups and automata theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoxeter groupMathematicsCombinatoricsPolytopeCosetVertex (graph theory)Type (biology)Symmetric groupGraph

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article investigates the question of when every double coset of a string $C$-group $G$ relative to its vertex stabilizer subgroup $H$ is represented by an involution. We show that this is the case for every finite string Coxeter group except in the $\{5,3,3\}$ case of type $H_4$, and for the infinite Coxeter groups of Schläfli type $\{4,4\}$ and $\{3,6\}$. From this it is immediate that, for every string $C$-group of these types, the double coset algebra $\mathbb{C}[G/\!\!/H]$ is commutative and all of its characters are realizable over $\mathbb{R}$. In particular, the abstract regular polytopes with these automorphism groups have a polyhedral realization cone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.608
Threshold uncertainty score0.278

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of CalgarySame topicsemigroups and automata theoryFrench-language works237,207