MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3161228179

WRHA MODULAR WHEELCHAIR SAFETY GUARDS

2016· article· en· W3161228179 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle License Plate Recognition
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModular designWheelchairComputer scienceComputer securityEngineeringAeronauticsWorld Wide WebProgramming language
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Winnipeg Regional Health Authority (WRHA) tasked BioTech Engineering Solutions & Technologies (BEST) with designing modular wheelchair safety guards for Personal Care Home (PCH) residents in Winnipeg. Some wheelchair-bound PCH residentsexperience gradual degradation of their trunk muscles over time, whichcauses them to slouch forward in their chair and leave their arms hanging over the sides. This condition increases the risk of catching hands, fingers or armsin the spokes of the wheelchair’s wheels.There are also other medical conditions that lead to the same increased risk of PCH residents injuring themselvesin the wheel area of their wheelchairs.Recently, a PCH resident sustained a hand injury due to getting caught in the spokes of their wheelchair, establishing the WRHA’s need for this project. Although the specific scenario from the recent injury can be used as a case study, the WRHA requested that BEST produce a solution that could protectother PCH residents in similar physical conditions in the future.To resolve this problem, BEST used an engineering design process that includedresearching existing products and patents, concept generation, concept selection, and detailed analysis. By following these steps in a timely manner,BEST was able to deliver a robust design solution to the WRHA.BEST’s solution to this problem is a Solid Hubcap Safety Guard that eliminates access to the spokes from the outer face of the wheel. This product is manufactured from a 1/8-inch thick ABS plastic sheet and, assuming the Solid Hubcaps are produced in batches of 100 units, the manufacturing cost is approximately $90 per pair of hubcaps. The product is attached to the wheelchair by securing Velcro®straps through the equally spaced slots about the front face of the hubcap and around the handrail of the wheelchair. As per the request of the client, this solution also includes a design for an optional Rear Safety Guard. The add-onis available for residents to purchase should they also require protection from accessing the spokes through the inner face of the wheel at the rear of the chair. BEST’s Solid Hubcap Safety Guard provides increased protection from hand injuries occurring in the spokes of wheelchair wheels at a lower cost...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.700
Threshold uncertainty score0.761

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.159
Teacher spread0.151 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it