Antenna Selection for Massive MIMO Systems Based on POMDP Framework
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We use a partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP) framework to formulate the problem of antenna selection for a base-station, equipped with a large-scale antenna array and a smaller number of RF chains. Assuming that the fading channel evolves according to a finite-state Markov chain and that only partial channel state information (CSI) from the limited selected antennas is available at each time slot, we rely on a POMDP framework for antenna selection to maximize the long-term expected downlink data rate. To avoid the computational complexity associated with the value iteration algorithm, we herein propose to use the simple myopic antenna selection policy based on the fact that for any arbitrary number of antennas and RF chains, under the assumption of positively correlated two-state Markov channel model, the myopic policy is optimal. To apply the optimal myopic policy-based antenna selection for general fading channels, we propose to quantize the channels into two values only for the purpose of antenna selection. Interestingly, our results show that the performance of the myopic antenna selection policy is close to that of the policy which relies on un-quantized full CSI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".