MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3161249986 · doi:10.23977/aetp.2021.52008

Research on Destination Projection and Tourist Perceived Image of College Students--Based on Symbolic Interactionism

2021· article· en· W3161249986 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Educational Technology and Psychology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCorporate Identity and Reputation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTourismPublicityDestination imageSymbolic interactionismAdvertisingDestinationsObject (grammar)The SymbolicSociologyPsychologyGeographyComputer scienceMarketingSocial psychologyArtificial intelligenceBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate shaping of the image of tourist destinations is a necessary prerequisite for the good development of tourism. This research took Lijiang as an example, took college students at school as the research object. It collected official online publicity texts, designed interview outlines, and interviewed college students to obtain relevant text data. It used text analysis and grounded theory to portray the image of the tourist destination and tourist perceived image of college students in the tourist destination. It used differential analysis to discuss differences in the three image themes of Lijiang's tourist attractions, history and humanities, and tourist infrastructure. Facing the group of college students and tourists, the research proposed suggestions for accurately shaping the image of Lijiang as a tourist destination based on symbolic interactionism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.402
Threshold uncertainty score0.301

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.383 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it