Motion and deformation of migrating compound droplets in shear-thinning fluids in a microcapillary tube
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The deformation dynamics of a moving compound droplet inside a microcapillary tube is investigated in Newtonian and non-Newtonian ambient fluids. The numerical method used is a ternary phase-field model to determine the temporal evolution and the subsequent hydrodynamics of compound droplets traveling inside a microcapillary tube. By solving the axisymmetric momentum equations, the compound droplet movement is identified by tracing the spatiotemporal evolution of a pair of two deformable interfaces. Results indicate that the rheological properties of the continuous phase significantly influence the compound droplet characteristics. The position of the center of the mass of both inner and outer drops along the tube axis increases linearly in a Newtonian ambient fluid while it is nonlinear in a non-Newtonian medium, and the deviation from the linear behavior increases as the concentration of the polymer solution increases. These distinct behaviors occur after a particular normalized time (t*, which is normalized with R/Uavg in which R is the radius of the tube and Uavg is the average inlet velocity) during the early stages of droplet formation (t*∼1). The migration of the compound drop inside a Newtonian fluid approaches a relatively constant velocity after a specific time of the initial movement. Conversely, the movement velocity of both drops increases gradually until the pinch-off moment in non-Newtonian fluids, which means that a moving compound drop has an accelerative motion in all stages of movement in non-Newtonian fluids. The findings presented here are essential for employing compound droplets in droplet microfluidic systems for biological applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".