Correlation between serum levels of C-reactive protein and neonatal pneumonia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Few studies have reported the correlation between serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and neonatal pneumonia. The purpose of the present meta-analysis was to clarify whether an increased serum level of CRP accelerates the development of neonatal pneumonia. METHODS: This protocol is conducted according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis protocol (PRISMA-P) statement guidelines. Related articles were identified by searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Science Direct, and CNKI databases. Two investigators extracted information according to the selection criteria and used a set of predefined criteria based on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) criteria to assess the studies. All calculations were carried out with Stata 12.0 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX). RESULTS: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. CONCLUSION: We hypothesized that a higher serum CRP level is closely correlated with the progression of neonatal pneumonia. CRP as a general systemic inflammation biomarker may help clinicians to make difficult therapeutic decisions for neonatal pneumonia. OPEN SCIENCE FRAMEWORK REGISTRATION NUMBER: 10.17605/OSF.IO/RGBMX.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.017 | 0.052 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.006 | 0.015 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".