MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3161503688 · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abf2066

Pathogenic variants in <i>SMARCA5</i> , a chromatin remodeler, cause a range of syndromic neurodevelopmental features

2021· article· en· W3161503688 on OpenAlexaff
Dong Li, Qin Wang, Naihua N. Gong, Alina Kurolap, Hagit Baris Feldman, Nikolas Boy, Melanie Brügger, Katheryn Grand, Kirsty McWalter, María J. Guillen Sacoto, Emma Wakeling, Jane A. Hurst, Michael March, Elizabeth Bhoj, Małgorzata J.M. Nowaczyk, Claudia Gonzaga‐Jauregui, Mariam Mathew, Ashita Dava-Wala, Amy Siemon, Dennis Bartholomew, Yue Huang, Hane Lee, Julián A. Martínez-Agosto, Eva Maria Christina Schwaibold, Theresa Brunet, Daniela Choukair, Lynn Pais, Susan M. White, John Christodoulou, Dana Brown, Kristin Lindstrom, Theresa A. Grebe, Dov Tiosano, Matthew S. Kayser, Tiong Yang Tan, Matthew A. Deardorff, Yuanquan Song, Håkon Håkonarson

Bibliographic record

VenueScience Advances · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicChromatin Remodeling and Cancer
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNational Human Genome Research InstituteNIH Office of the DirectorNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational Institutes of HealthNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchMurdoch Children's Research InstituteNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeChildren’s Hospital of Wisconsin Research InstituteState Government of VictoriaBroad InstituteWellcome Trust
KeywordsChromatinComputational biologyComputer scienceGeneticsBiologyDNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exome sequencing and Drosophila modeling revealed variants in SMARCA5 as a novel cause of a neurodevelopmental disorder.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScience AdvancesSame topicChromatin Remodeling and CancerFrench-language works237,207