MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3161556065 · doi:10.36253/978-88-5518-286-7.13

Stato d’animo e significato in architettura

2021· book-chapter· en· W3161556065 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFirenze University Press eBooks · 2021
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAttunementEmbodied cognitionSituatedConsciousnessExperiential learningArchitectureHarmony (color)GermanMoodAestheticsPsychologySociologyArtVisual artsEpistemologySocial psychologyPedagogyPhilosophyComputer scienceLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Explores the role of mood and meaning in architectural experience via the German no-tion of stimmung, relating to the central questions of temperance and harmony in music and architecture. Motor resonance and attunement are under-acknowledged ways that architecture shapes experience. Pedagogical skills that acknowledge the complexity of an embodied and situated consciousness, emphasising qualitative, experiential and em-bodied approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it