MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3161578740 · doi:10.1109/vrw52623.2021.00245

[DC] Embodying an avatar with an asymmetrical lower body to modulate the dynamic characteristics of gait initiation

2021· article· en· W3161578740 on OpenAlexaff
Valentin Vallageas, Rachid Aïssaoui, David Labbé

Bibliographic record

Venue2021 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVirtual Reality Applications and Impacts
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAvatarIllusionKinematicsComputer scienceVirtual realityTask (project management)Human–computer interactionGaitPerspective (graphical)Virtual machineComputer visionSimulationArtificial intelligencePhysical medicine and rehabilitationPsychologyCognitive psychologyEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Virtual reality (VR) enables the user to perceive body owner ship towards a virtual body. This illusion is induced through first-person perspective (1PP) and synchronous movement with the real body. Previous studies have shown that pronounced differences between the real and the virtual body lead to changes in the user's behavior. It has also been shown that modifying the body image can affect the user's movements. Nevertheless, the state of the art does not refer to the kinetic and kinematic impacts of one virtual lower limb deformation. Therefore, this paper presents a methodology exploring the impact of a self-avatar with an asymmetrical lower body (one limb longer or larger than the other) on the dynamic characteristics of the user during a gait initiation task.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2021 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW)Same topicVirtual Reality Applications and ImpactsFrench-language works237,207