An 11 year record of GOSAT XCO2 measurements from NASA's ACOS version 9 retrieval algorithms: comparisons to models, TCCON, and OCO-2
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The GOSAT TANSO-FTS sensor has been collecting high spectral resolution measurements of reflected solar radiation in the Oxygen A-band (0.76 microns) and two shortwave-infrared carbon dioxide (CO2) absorption bands (1.6 and 2.0 microns) since April, 2009. The measured radiances allow for estimates of the total column carbon dioxide (XCO2) via retrieval inversion. An eleven year long record of XCO2 retrieved via NASA’s Atmospheric Carbon Observations from Space (ACOS) build 9 software suite is analyzed and discussed. The v9 XCO2 data has been publicly available on the NASA Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (GES DISC) since the spring of 2020. The ACOS GOSAT v9 XCO2 is evaluated against CO2 flux inversion models, observations from the Total Carbon Column Observation Network (TCCON), as well as against collocated measurements from NASA’s OCO-2 satellite. The results indicate a product that agrees with OCO-2 and models within approximately 0.25 ppm with less than 1 ppm standard deviation (σ). Agreement with TCCON is within approximately 0.1 ppm with approximately 1 ppm σ for daily overpass mean aggregated data. The ACOS GOSAT v9 XCO2 product will allow CO2 flux inversion modelers and terrestrial ecologists to address questions about long term (decadal) carbon cycle dynamics related to net and gross carbon fluxes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".