MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3161691929 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-444811/v1

Conversion of microplastics to flocs during estuarine mixing the Aras River with the Caspian Sea

2021· preprint· en· W3161691929 on OpenAlexaff
Mehdi Heidari, Abdolreza Karbassi, Zahra Dorbeigi Namaghi, Flora Heidari

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicroplastics and Plastic Pollution
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicroplasticsFlocculationEstuarySalinityEnvironmental scienceSeawaterPollutantOceanographyEnvironmental chemistryMixing (physics)Environmental engineeringFisheryEcologyChemistryBiologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Microplastics originated from various sources are carried by rivers into oceans, seas and lakes. In the last few years, the accumulation of microplastic particles in marine environments has been on the increase which causes irreversible damages to flora, fauna and human health. One of the most considerable processes in an estuary is the flocculation process. The flocculation process converts pollutants to flocs or greater particles. In the present study, the conversion of microplastics to flocs during estuarine mixing of the Aras River water and the Caspian Sea water is investigated for the first time. The results clearly show that a huge percentage of microplastics (99.95%) are converted to greater particles (> 5mm) due to the flocculation process. The maximum flocculation rate of microplastics (47.37%) is observed at the salinity of 0.25 ppt. Moreover, 35.71% of microplastics are flocculated at the salinity of 29 ppt. Salinity enhances the flocculation of microplastics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Square→Same topicMicroplastics and Plastic Pollution→French-language works237,207→