MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3161716120 · doi:10.1109/holm.1995.482855

Mechanical and electrical contact properties of wedge-connectors

2002· article· en· W3161716120 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrical Contact Performance and Analysis
Canadian institutionsMining Association of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCable glandWedge (geometry)Finite element methodMaterials scienceElectrical contactsContact resistanceElectrical conductorStructural engineeringComposite materialMechanical jointAluminiumElectrical resistance and conductanceMechanical engineeringEngineeringLayer (electronics)Optics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper describes the mechanical and electrical contact properties of a typical fired wedge-connector. The measured forces and displacements in the connector components are compared with the predictions of a Finite Element Analysis (FEA) of a wedge-connector interfaced with solid aluminium conductors. The distribution of mechanical stresses resulting from typical applied mechanical loads are evaluated using a nonlinear FEA code. The nonlinear input data for the FEA calculations were obtained from mechanical testing of metal specimens obtained from connectors used in the investigation. Measurements of contact resistance of the electrical interfaces are also reported. The wipe-off of surface oxide films from the electrical interfaces during connector installation is described.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.526
Threshold uncertainty score0.300

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it