SuperVoxHenry: Tucker-Enhanced and FFT-Accelerated Inductance Extraction for Voxelized Superconducting Structures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article introduces SuperVoxHenry, an inductance extraction simulator for analyzing voxelized superconducting structures. SuperVoxHenry extends the capabilities of the inductance extractor VoxHenry for analyzing the superconducting structures by incorporating the following enhancements. First, SuperVoxHenry utilizes a two-fluid model to account for normal currents and supercurrents. Second, SuperVoxHenry introduces the Tucker decompositions to reduce the memory requirement of circulant tensors as well as the setup time of the simulator. Finally, SuperVoxHenry incorporates an aggregation-based algebraic multigrid technique to obtain the sparse preconditioner. With these enhancements, SuperVoxHenry allows extracting the inductance of large-scale superconducting structures on a desktop computer. The accuracy, efficiency, and applicability of the proposed SuperVoxHenry have been demonstrated through the inductance extraction of various superconducting structures, including superconducting thin film inductors, a sharp bend, as well as a subsystem of an energy-efficient single flux quantum circuit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".