MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3161826860 · doi:10.1093/eurjpc/zwab061.259

Patient education interventions for health behaviour change in adults diagnosed with coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021· review· en· W3161826860 on OpenAlexaff
Wendan Shi, GLM Ghisi, Ling Zhang, Karice Hyun, Maureen Pakosh, Robyn Gallagher

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Preventive Cardiology · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
Canadian institutionsToronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePsychological interventionMeta-analysisPatient educationDiseaseIntervention (counseling)Physical therapyFamily medicineMEDLINEHealth educationInternal medicinePublic health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Patient education is recommended to increase disease-related knowledge and modify coronary heart disease (CHD) risk factors. Although the importance has been established, there is a lack of knowledge of its efficacy and relative impact of duration on disease-related knowledge and health behaviour outcomes. Purpose It aimed to assess the efficacy of structured patient education on those outcomes in adults with CHD for short-term (less than six months) and long-term (six to 12 months) effect. Methods Eligible randomised controlled trials published in English, Simplified Chinese, Spanish, and Portuguese were searched in seven electronic databases from database inception through 2020. Reference lists, relevant conference lists, and keywords from the Internet were also searched. Outcomes included disease-related knowledge, smoking cessation, medication adherence, physical activity, and healthy dietary behaviour. Results Overall, 73 studies reporting 71 unique trials were included. Participants (n = 24,985) were aged mean 60.5 ± 5.7 years, mostly male (72.5%). About 74% of studies used more than one mode for education delivery, with phone calls and booklets being used the most frequent. Patient education was associated with significant improvement in all outcomes measured in meta-analyses (P < 0.05). In addition, regression analyses showed that a prolonged intervention duration does not significantly improve the outcomes, except for the disease knowledge (p = 0.009) and physical activity (p = 0.026). Conclusions Structured patient education, in a variety of modes and intensities, improves disease-related knowledge and health behaviours in adults with CHD. The findings can be used to guide design of cardiac programs, particularly related to intervention duration in clinical practice. Abstract Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0180.029
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.427
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Preventive CardiologySame topicHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionFrench-language works237,207