A FERROVIA E A CONSTRUÇÃO DO ESPAÇO SOCIAL DE CAMPO GRANDE-MS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neste artigo serão analisadas as práticas espaciais que envolveram o complexo ferroviário da Estrada de Ferro Noroeste do Brasil e suas relações com o sítio urbano de Campo Grande/ MS, desde a celebração da sua chegada até a negação da sua presença com a retirada dos trilhos urbanos e posterior atribuição de novos usos. A partir de uma revisão bibliográfica com atenção a obra de Henri Lefebvre, é proposta uma reflexão sobre o sentido do espaço social como expressão material síntese das práticas sociais de um determinado grupo ao longo do tempo; concluindo-se que a convivência dos habitantes de Campo Grande com o trem e os aspectos desta relação são constituintes da tessitura socioespacial da cidade e mesmo a ausência do trem na vida urbana não diminui a sua importância, registrada no espaço social da cidade.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".