MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3161923442

유럽화와 스웨덴 노사갈등: 라발 사례를 중심으로

2017· article· ko· W3161923442 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
신광영

Bibliographic record

Venue스칸디나비아 연구 · 2017
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldEngineering
TopicMilitary Technology and Strategies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

본 논문은 라트비아 건설회사와 스웨덴 건설노조 사이에서 벌어진 새로운 형태의 노사분규인 라발 사례(Laval case)를 중심으로 유럽연합 가입에 따른 유럽 시장통합의 추세와 스웨덴 국내 노사관계 제도 간의 갈등을 분석한다. 라발 사례는 임시파견노동자 고용을 둘러싼 유럽연합의 법이 스웨덴의 노사관계 모델에 미치는 부정적인 효과를 보여주었다. 동시에 라발 사례는 유럽연합과 회원국들 간의 법적 혹은 제도적인 차이의 중요성을 보여주었다. 결론적으로 라발 사례는 유럽화에 의한 시장통합과 유럽화에 부재한 사회적 유럽 간의 딜레마를 보여준다는 점을 논의한다.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.036
Scholarly communication0.0100.008
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue스칸디나비아 연구Same topicMilitary Technology and StrategiesFrench-language works237,207