MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3161961828 · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2021.1910162

Reading difficulty and socio-emotional adjustment: Internalizing patterns depend on age of identification

2021· article· en· W3161961828 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Alyse Sukovieff, Richard S. Kruk

Bibliographic record

VenueCogent Education · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicReading and Literacy Development
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversity of Manitoba
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPsychologyReading (process)Developmental psychologyIdentification (biology)Cognitive psychologyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Children with reading difficulty experience stress in school that may put them at risk of negative socio-emotional adjustment involving externalizing or internalizing patterns. It is unclear what factors influence some children to experience externalizing patterns and others internalizing patterns. This study investigated the influences of the age of identification of reading difficulties and coping strategies on socio-emotional adjustment. Data were collected from 31 children with reading difficulty (ages 9 to 12 years), recruited from Winnipeg schools and child-care centres, on measures of coping strategy and socio-emotional adjustment and parent/guardian reported age-of-identification. Direct and indirect process analyses, using percentile bootstrapping, were used to examine mediating effects of coping strategies in the relationship between age-of identification and socio-emotional adjustment. Results showed late-identified children (in Grade 2 or later) were more likely to report using disengagement coping strategies. Early-identified children (before Grade 2) were more likely to report higher internalizing patterns. Evidence for partial mediation by secondary coping strategy on the relationship between age-of-identification and internalizing outcomes was found. No other mediation patterns were found, including indirect effects of age-of-identification on socio-emotional functioning through coping. Although early identification of reading difficulties is associated with greater risk of developing internalizing problems, patterns of coping with reading-related stress have limited influence. Clarifying how age of identification of reading difficulty influences socio-emotional adjustment will help resolve theoretical debates about the experience of reading difficulty as a risk factor for negative socio-emotional adjustment, and will help educators/clinicians to promote struggling readers’ healthy socio-emotional adjustment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCogent EducationSame topicReading and Literacy DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207