Radiographic Coronal Imbalance and Shoulder Asymmetry Continue to Improve Between 2 and 5 Years Following Surgery of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Managing patients with coronal imbalance (CI) and shoulder height asymmetry following scoliosis surgery can be challenging. Little is known about the course of findings over time and whether they improve or persist. The aim was to report the rate of suboptimal radiographic CI or shoulder asymmetry (SA) at 5 years in patients who were already reported to have CI or SA 2 years after surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). METHODS: An AIS database was reviewed for patients with both 2- and 5-year follow-up after surgery. From this cohort, patients with CI>2 cm or SA>2 cm at their 2-year follow-up were identified and reevaluated, using the same parameters, at 5-year follow-up. RESULTS: Of 916 patients, 157 (17%) patients had CI and 69 (8%) patients had SA at 2-year follow-up. At 5 years this improved to 53 (6%) and 11 patients (1%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Having coronal or shoulder imbalance 2 years after surgery for AIS does not guarantee continued imbalance 5 years after surgery. Most patients demonstrate some improvement in these measures of clinical deformity. Anticipating the potential course following a postoperative coronal balance and shoulder height differences can help surgeons manage and counsel their patients appropriately. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level II-therapeutic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".