MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3161987059

A Panorama of Early Childhood Education in Nepal: Focus on Experience of Mothers

2011· article· en· W3161987059 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Youn Ju Chang, Kul B Basnet, Kyung Chul Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueEarly childhood education · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEarly Childhood Education and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEarly childhood educationPanoramaEarly childhoodFocus groupPolitical scienceState (computer science)Childhood educationPsychologyCommunity educationPedagogyEconomic growthDevelopmental psychologySociology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Early childhood education is necessary to establish inclusive societies. The main problem of the education system in Nepal is the low rate of retention in the primary schools. The purpose of this study is to explore and understand the early childhood education situation in Nepal. In order to collect the research data, individual in-depth interviews with Nepalese mothers and the documents related with the social economic situation, education policy, early of Nepal were gathered. The study reveals that community participation at the early childhood education level must go hand-in-hand with commitment and forceful influence on the part of the state. Parental support and education programs are extraordinarily necessary to assist parents in helping their young children not only to survive and thrive, but also to develop their full potential.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEarly childhood education→Same topicEarly Childhood Education and Development→French-language works237,207→