MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3162078592 · doi:10.1139/cjc-2020-0329

Starting grassroots initiatives to foster equity, diversity, and inclusivity in the Chemistry Department at the University of Alberta

2021· article· en· W3162078592 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Sorina Chiorean, Meagan S. Oakley, Jocelyn Sinclair

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCareer Development and Diversity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrassrootsDiversity (politics)Equity (law)ChemistryInclusion (mineral)Public relationsPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The University of Alberta Working for Inclusivity in Chemistry (UAWIC) group was formed in 2017 to increase equity, diversity, and inclusion in the Department of Chemistry. With the goals of fostering a community amongst department members and retaining a diverse graduate student population, UAWIC has created initiatives addressing equity, diversity and inclusivity, professional development, and promoted visibility of diversity within the department. Training students how to overcome systemic barriers and providing platforms to share experiences will help aspiring chemists prepare for future career paths and develop a network of mentors and colleagues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.398
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicCareer Development and DiversityFrench-language works237,207