MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Subcostal TAPSE measured by anatomical M-mode: prospective reliability clinical study in critically ill patients

2021· article· en· W3162174276 on OpenAlexaff
Roman Škulec, Tomas Parizek, Barbora Štádlerová, Marcela Bílská, Vladimír Černý

Bibliographic record

VenueMinerva Anestesiologica · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineProspective cohort studyCritically illIntensive care unitEjection fractionVentricular functionHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), evaluated from a four-chamber apical view, is an echocardiographic parameter for the detection of right ventricular systolic dysfunction (RVD). We decided to assess the reliability of TAPSE measured from subcostal view (sTAPSE) by anatomical M-mode imaging (AMM) for evaluation of right ventricular systolic function and prediction of RVD in the critically ill patients by comparison with other echocardiographic parameters. METHODS: We conducted an observational, prospective clinical study in 100 patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit. TAPSE, doppler tissue imaging-derived tricuspid lateral annular systolic velocity (DTI-S' wave), two-dimensional fraction area change (2D FAC) and DTI-right ventricular index of myocardial performance (DTI-RIMP) were measured by transthoracic echocardiography. A subcostal four-chamber view was recorded for sTAPSE measurement. For that purpose, the cursor of AMM was aligned along the direction of the tricuspid lateral annulus movement and the amplitude of the movement was measured. RESULTS: In a group of patients aged 64±16 years with a 31% prevalence of RVD we identified strong correlation between TAPSE and sTAPSE (r=0.963, P<0.001). sTAPSE correlated well with other measures of right ventricular systolic function (DTI-S' wave: r=0.765; 2D FAC: r=0.701; DTI-RIMP: r=-0.661, P<0.001, respectively). The value of sTAPSE ≤15 mm predicted the presence of RVD defined by TAPSE with a sensitivity of 94.7% and specificity of 100.0%. CONCLUSIONS: The sTAPSE measured by AMM in a population of critically ill patients has been found to be a reliable parameter of right ventricular systolic function and predicted RVD with high reliability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Observationallow
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Observationalhigh
models agreeAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMinerva AnestesiologicaSame topicPulmonary Hypertension Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207