Estructura Factorial del Funcionamiento Neuropsicológico en la Discapacidad Intelectual Leve en Niños
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Se realizó un análisis factorial exploratorio para establecer la estructura factorial del funcionamiento neuropsicológico en la discapacidad intelectual leve en niños. Fue un estudio cuantitativo, descriptivo y transversal. Se incluyeron 80 niños con diagnóstico de discapacidad intelectual leve. Se aplicó una extensa batería de pruebas neuropsicológicas. Se realizó un Análisis Factorial Exploratorio para identificar los factores principales. Los resultados mostraron que la discapacidad intelectual leve en niños tienen una estructura en la que las funciones neuropsicológicas asociadas con el funcionamiento ejecutivo explican un 56 % de la varianza y tienen una prioridad factorial sobre un 13 % que explican las variables asociadas con dos tests tradicionales para evaluar la inteligencia. Se analiza y discute cada factor desde la neuropsicología clínica y experimental. Los hallazgos del estudio tienen implicaciones teóricas y clínicas para el diagnóstico diferencial. Palabras clave: discapacidad intelectual leve, Funciones Ejecutivas, inteligencia, neuropsicología, Niños
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".