MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3162239383 · doi:10.1002/slct.202100354

In‐Silico Tuning of Curcumin Loading on PEG Grafted Chitosan: An Atomistic Simulation

2021· article· en· W3162239383 on OpenAlexaff
Somayeh Sohrabi, Mohammad Khedri, Reza Maleki, Mostafa Keshavarz Moraveji, Ebrahim Ghasemy

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistrySelect · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPolysaccharides Composition and Applications
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersAmirkabir University of Technology
KeywordsCurcuminPolyethylene glycolBiocompatibilityChitosanPEG ratioDrug deliveryMaterials sciencePolymerChemical engineeringPEG 400ChemistryNanotechnologyOrganic chemistryComposite materialBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this work, trimethyl chitosan grafted polyethylene glycol (PEG) was employed to optimize the curcumin loading, which is a natural bioactive substance with a good anti‐cancerous effect. It is vital to develop a novel carrier to increase the therapeutic effect of curcumin and decrease its hydrophobicity. Biocompatibility and hydrophilicity of the PEG cause it to be one of the most attractive drug carriers. Chitosan is also of great importance, considering its biocompatibility, and is used along with the drug‐carrying polymers. In this work, interaction energies, stability, hydrophilicity, and other molecular properties of the curcumin‐loaded PEG‐chitosan nanohybrid have been investigated. Atomistic analysis showd that the optimum concentration of chitosan is 60 % and optimum concentration of PEG is 40 %. In addition to concentration, the effect of PEG chain length, which is one of the important parameters of this circimin delivery system, has been also studied. The current work gives an atomistic insight into curcumin delivery and suggests a new curcumin delivery system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.238

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemistrySelectSame topicPolysaccharides Composition and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207