WASP integrates substrate topology and cell polarity to guide neutrophil migration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To control their shape and movement, cells leverage nucleation promoting factors (NPFs) to regulate when and where they polymerize actin. Here we investigate the role of the immune-specific NPF WASP during neutrophil migration. Endogenously-tagged WASP localizes to substrate-induced plasma membrane deformations. Super-resolution imaging of live cells reveals that WASP preferentially enriches to the necks of these substrate-induced membrane invaginations, a distribution that could support substrate pinching. Unlike other curvature-sensitive proteins, WASP only enriches to membrane deformations at the cell front, where it controls Arp2/3 complex recruitment and actin polymerization. Despite relatively normal migration on flat substrates, WASP depletion causes defects in topology sensing and directed migration on textured substrates. WASP therefore both responds to and reinforces cell polarity during migration. Surprisingly, front-biased WASP puncta continue to form in the absence of Cdc42. We propose that WASP integrates substrate topology with cell polarity for 3D guidance by selectively polymerizing actin around substrate-induced membrane deformations at the leading edge. A misregulation of WASP-mediated contact guidance could provide insight into the immune disorder Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".