MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3162473050 · doi:10.1109/ojcas.2021.3072884

Lightweight Compression of Intermediate Neural Network Features for Collaborative Intelligence

2021· article· en· W3162473050 on OpenAlexaff
Robert Cohen, Hyomin Choi, Ivan V. Bajić

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Open Journal of Circuits and Systems · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceEdge deviceCodecQuantization (signal processing)Clipping (morphology)Artificial neural networkEntropy encodingAlgorithmFloating pointData compressionCloud computingComputer engineeringArtificial intelligenceComputer hardware

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In collaborative intelligence applications, part of a deep neural network (DNN) is deployed on a lightweight device such as a mobile phone or edge device, and the remaining portion of the DNN is processed where more computing resources are available, such as in the cloud. This paper presents a novel lightweight compression technique designed specifically to quantize and compress the features output by the intermediate layer of a split DNN, without requiring any retraining of the network weights. Mathematical models for estimating the clipping and quantization error of leaky-ReLU and ReLU activations at this intermediate layer are used to compute optimal clipping ranges for coarse quantization. A mathematical model for estimating the clipping and quantization error of leaky-ReLU activations at this intermediate layer is developed and used to compute optimal clipping ranges for coarse quantization. We also present a modified entropy-constrained design algorithm for quantizing clipped activations. When applied to popular object-detection and classification DNNs, we were able to compress the 32-bit floating point intermediate activations down to 0.6 to 0.8 bits, while keeping the loss in accuracy to less than 1%. When compared to HEVC, we found that the lightweight codec consistently provided better inference accuracy, by up to 1.3%. The performance and simplicity of this lightweight compression technique makes it an attractive option for coding an intermediate layer of a split neural network for edge/cloud applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Open Journal of Circuits and SystemsSame topicAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesFrench-language works237,207