Pulmonary Vein Thrombosis in a Patient With Multiple Myeloma on Treatment With Lenalidomide
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) poses inherent risk of thrombosis that can be amplified by the use of immunomodulator therapy. We present a patient with MM who was being treated with lenalidomide and dexamethasone when he developed progressive dyspnea on exertion consistent with a left lower pulmonary vein thrombosis (PVT) despite use of prophylactic aspirin. The PVT was not initially seen on standard computed tomography angiogram pulmonary embolism protocol but was seen on 192-slice multidetector computed tomography angiogram for assessment of coronary calcifications 8 months later. Subsequent treatment with full dose rivaroxaban resulted in full clot resolution and symptom improvement. PVT has not been previously reported with lenalidomide therapy and may not be a forefront differential diagnosis. In such cases, a multi-modality diagnostic approach may be beneficial. Consideration should be given to escalating venous thromboembolism prophylaxis to full dose anticoagulation during increased prothrombotic windows, such as the time of treatment initiation or dose adjustments, in low bleeding risk patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".