MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Experimental research on a hydrokinetic turbine model

2021· article· en· W3162536050 on OpenAlexaff
Adrian Nedelcu, Florentina Bunea, Paul Dancă, Rareş-Andrei Chihaia, Corina Băbuţanu, Dorian Marin, Gabriel Dan Ciocan

Bibliographic record

VenueIOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWind Energy Research and Development
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTurbineMarine engineeringRenewable energyEnvironmental scienceFlow (mathematics)Characterization (materials science)Channel (broadcasting)Rotational speedEngineeringMechanical engineeringMechanicsMaterials scienceElectrical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The renewable energy policy strongly encourages the use of all renewable sources of energy. ICPE-CA starts to develop a new hydrokinetic turbine to be implemented in small rivers or water channels with a low investment cost. In a first step, the characterization of a laboratory reduced scale turbine model is performed. The hydrokinetic turbine model is implemented in a free surface water channel. The produced power for many flow rates and rotation speed of the turbine, as well as the detailed flow characterization (PIV measurements) are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.515

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental ScienceSame topicWind Energy Research and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207