MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3162564027 · doi:10.1161/circ.143.suppl_1.p013

Abstract P013: Validating The Utility Of Plasma Biomarkers In The Prediction Of Readmission Or Mortality Following Congenital Heart Surgery

2021· article· en· W3162564027 on OpenAlexaff
Devin M. Parker, Michael Zappitelli, Heather Thiessen‐Philbrook, Allen D. Everett, Meagan E. Stabler, Marshall L. Jacobs, Jeffrey P. Jacobs, Chirag R. Parikh, Jeremiah R. Brown

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCohortBiomarkerHazard ratioProportional hazards modelInternal medicineCohort studyIntensive care medicineEmergency medicineConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Unplanned readmission is associated with higher risks of complications, death, and increased costs. Accurate statistical models to stratify the risk of 30-day readmission or death after congenital heart surgery could help clinical teams focus care on those patients at highest risk. We hypothesized biomarkers could improve prediction for readmission or mortality. Methods: Levels of pre- and postoperative ST2, Galectin-3, NT-proBNP and GFAP were measured in plasma samples from 162 pediatric congenital heart surgery patients from Johns Hopkins Hospital with external validation in 360 pediatric patients from an international multi-center TRIBE-AKI cohort. A model based on clinical variables from the Society of Thoracic Surgery Congenital database (STS-CHSD) was developed in the Hopkins cohort. We tested and externally validated the clinical models and biomarker panels in the TRIBE-AKI cohort using AUROC statistics and Kaplan-Meier cox hazard regression models. Results: There were 55 patients (10.5%) that experienced unplanned readmission or died within 30 days after congenital heart surgery. The STS-CHSD clinical model resulted in an AUROC of 0.617 (95% CI: 0.47 - 0.76). The derivation cohort with the biomarker augmented STS-CHSD clinical model resulted in a significantly improved AUROC of 0.802 (95%CI: 0.72 - 0.89; p=0.003). External validation of the biomarker augmented STS-CHSD clinical model showed limited improvement (AUROC: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.49-0.72; p value= 0.47). Conclusions: Our findings indicate that these biomarkers can be used for early identification of children at increased risk of readmission or death after pediatric congenital heart surgery. While the addition of biomarkers improve prediction in our derivation cohort, external validation was poor. Our findings suggest there are other potential biomarkers and factors to be explored to improve prediction of readmission or mortality for children following congenital heart surgery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.044
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.092

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.044
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCongenital Heart Disease Studies→French-language works237,207→