Speech Emotion Recognition Using Quaternion Convolutional Neural Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although speech recognition has become a widespread technology, inferring emotion from speech signals remains a challenge. Our paper addresses this problem by proposing a quaternion convolutional neural network (QCNN) based speech emotion recognition (SER) model in which Mel-spectrogram features of speech signals are encoded in an RGB quaternion domain. We demonstrate that our QCNN based SER model outperforms other real-valued methods in the Ryerson Audio-Visual Database of Emotional Speech and Song (RAVDESS, 8-classes) dataset, achieving, to the best of our knowledge, state-of-the-art results. The QCNN model also achieves comparable results with state-of-the-art methods in the Interactive Emotional Dyadic Motion Capture (IEMOCAP 4-classes) and Berlin EMO-DB (7-classes) datasets. Specifically, the model achieves an accuracy of 77.87%, 70.46%, and 88.78% for the RAVDESS, IEMOCAP, and EMO-DB datasets, respectively. Additionally, model size results reveal that the quaternion unit structure is significantly better able to encode internal dependencies than real-valued structures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".