The transcriptional landscape analysis of basal cell carcinomas reveals novel signalling pathways and actionable targets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common skin cancer and human malignancy. Although most BCCs are easily managed, some are aggressive locally, require Mohs micrographic surgery, or can even metastasize. In the latter, resistance to Sonic Hedgehog inhibitors may occur. Despite their frequent occurrence in clinical practice, their transcriptional landscape remains poorly understood. By analyzing BCC RNA sequencing data according to clinically important features (all BCCs versus normal skin, high-risk versus low-risk BCCs based solely on histopathological subtypes with aggressive features, advanced versus non-advanced BCCs, and vismodegib-resistant versus vismodegib-sensitive tumors), we have identified novel differentially regulated genes and new targetable pathways implicated in BCC tumorigenesis. Pathways as diverse as IL-17 , TLR , Akt/PI3K , cadherins, integrins, PDGF , and Wnt/ β -catenin are promising therapeutic avenues for local and systemic agents in managing this common malignancy, including through drug re-purposing of existing medications. We experimentally validated several of these targets as biomarkers in our patient-derived cohort of primary BCC tumors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".