MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3162614227 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu21-10875

Deglacial records of terrigenous organic matter accumulation off the Yukon and Amur rivers using lignin phenols and long-chain n-alkanes as biomarkers

2021· article· en· W3162614227 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mengli Cao, Jens Hefter, Ralf Tiedemann, Lester Lembke‐Jene, Gesine Mollenhauer

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerrigenous sedimentPermafrostOrganic matterArcticSedimentEnvironmental chemistryGlacial periodLigninEnvironmental scienceGeologyEcologyPhysical geographyChemistryOceanographyPaleontologyGeographyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anthropogenic climate change has profound impacts on Arctic temperatures, with consequences for Arctic ecosystems and landscapes, and the stability of organic-rich permafrost deposits. When mobilized, these permafrost deposits might release vast amounts of greenhouse gases. We use periods of past rapid warming in the high latitudes as analogues to study the ecological changes and effects on permafrost stability under climate change. We used marine sediment cores from the Bering and Okhotsk Sea continental margins, off the mouths of the Yukon and Amur rivers, to study two types of terrigenous biomarkers, which trace different terrestrial organic carbon (OC) components and transport pathways, and cover the early deglaciation to the early Holocene. The Yukon basin remains within the permafrost-affected region today, whereas the Amur basin changed from being subject to complete permafrost cover during the last glacial to permafrost-free conditions today. Vascular plant-derived lignin phenols were analyzed and compared to published n-alkane content data. The carbon- and sediment-normalized contents of the vanillyl phenols (V), syringyl phenols (S), and cinnamyl phenols (C) phenols (Λ8 and Σ8) reflect the content of lignin dominantly transported by river runoff. The C/V and S/V ratios serve to distinguish between woody and non-woody tissues of angiosperms and gymnosperms. The acid to aldehyde ratios of V and S phenols ((Ad/Al)V and (Ad/Al)S) indicate the degree of lignin degradation. In addition, the ratio of 3,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid to V (3,5Bd/V) likely reflects the wetland extent, while lignin reflects primarily transportation into the marine sediment via surface runoff. In contrast, the n-alkane contents represent primarily terrigenous organic matter eroded from deeper deposits and a second marker for wetland extent via the Paq index. Lignin and n-alkane mass accumulation rates (MAR) can thus be used to reconstruct the mobilization of different carbon pools and the relative timing of the processes leading to their export to the ocean. The MAR of biomarkers and the wetland indicators 3,5 Bd/V and Paq start to increase in the Bering Sea sediment during the early deglaciation (19-14.6 ka BP), while no obvious change in lignin MAR in the Okhotsk Sea occurred during this time. We observe distinct peaks of mass accumulation rates, wetland indices and indicators for degradation of lignin (Ad/Al) in both sediment cores during the warm Bølling-Allerød (12.9-14.6 ka BP) and Pre-Boreal (9-11.5 ka BP) intervals, and during the Younger Dryas cold spell (11.5-12.9 ka BP). In contrast, in the Okhotsk Sea, the ratios of S/V and C/V did not change before the Preboreal. Our biomarker data suggest that the permafrost in the Yukon basin may have started to be remobilized by inland warming leading to wetland development in the early deglaciation, while the onset of permafrost degradation in the Amur basin occurred during the Preboreal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.920
Threshold uncertainty score0.159

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicClimate change and permafrost→French-language works237,207→