MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3162701064 · doi:10.1002/alz.12307

Erratum

2021· erratum· en· W3162701064 on OpenAlexaff
Vincent Mok, Sarah T. Pendlebury, Adrian Wong, Suvarna Alladi, Lisa Au, Philip M. Bath, Geert Jan Biessels, Christopher Chen, Charlotte Cordonnier, Martin Dichgans, Jacqueline C. Dominguez, Philip B. Gorelick, SangYun Kim, Timothy Kwok, Steven M. Greenberg, Jianping Jia, Raj N. Kalaria, Miia Kivipelto, Kandiah Naegandran, Linda Lam, Bonnie Lam, Allen Lee, Hugh S. Markus, John T. O’Brien, Ming‐Chyi Pai, Leonardo Pantoni, Perminder S. Sachdev, Vorapun Senanarong, Ingmar Skoog, Eric E. Smith, Velandai Srikanth, Guk‐Hee Suh, Joanna M. Wardlaw, Ho Ko, Sandra E. Black, Philip Scheltens

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2021
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicBrain Tumor Detection and Classification
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreHeart and Stroke FoundationUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science CentreUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Institute for Health and Care Research
KeywordsRegretCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PsychologyMedicineGerontologyDiseaseStatisticsMathematicsPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the paper by Mok et al. (“Tackling challenges in care of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias amid the COVID-19 pandemic, now and in the future.”Alzheimer's Dement. 2020; 16: 1571-1581. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.12143), an error occurred in the preparation of the paper for publication, requiring the following correction. In the initial publication of this article, Vorapun Senanarong, BSc, MD, was inadvertently omitted from the author group. The corrected author group and affiliations list appear above. We regret the error.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.459
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicBrain Tumor Detection and ClassificationFrench-language works237,207