MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3162717142 · doi:10.7202/1076819ar

Ruwen Ogien et John Dewey : dialogue pour une éthique éducative de l’hospitalité

2021· article· fr· W3162717142 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Christophe Point

Bibliographic record

VenueÉthique en éducation et en formation Les Dossiers du GREE · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicEthics in medical practice
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Notre travail cherche à faire dialoguer Ruwen Ogien et John Dewey sur le terrain de la philosophie de l’éducation, dans le but de construire avec eux une éthique éducative valable pour nos régimes démocratiques. Plus précisément, nous nous intéressons au déploiement de l’éthique au sein des processus éducatifs que les points de convergences entre ces deux auteurs autorisent. Notre hypothèse de travail cherche à trouver, au-delà des différences de positions éthiques de ces deux auteurs, ce qui les rapproche et permettrait de tisser une éthique éducative commune. Cette dernière prend les traits d’une éthique de l’hospitalité, éthique où l’hospitalité sera envisagée dans un cadre démocratique, à la fois comme un mouvement envers les autres, mais également en direction de soi et du savoir. Ainsi, en distinguant l’hospitalité de l’appartenance, de la tolérance et de la bienveillance, nous faisons le pari qu’ensemble, Ogien et Dewey peuvent nous aider à construire cette éthique éducative de l’hospitalité dont nos démocraties actuelles ont tant besoin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.042
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.139
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.800
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0420.139
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.004
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0030.016
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.431
Teacher spread0.370 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉthique en éducation et en formation Les Dossiers du GREESame topicEthics in medical practiceFrench-language works237,207