Enhanced detection of cortical atrophy in Alzheimer's disease using structural MRI with anatomically constrained longitudinal registration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cortical atrophy is a defining feature of Alzheimer's disease (AD), often detectable before symptoms arise. In surface-based analyses, studies have commonly focused on cortical thinning while overlooking the impact of loss in surface area. To capture the impact of both cortical thinning and surface area loss, we used anatomically constrained Multimodal Surface Matching (aMSM), a recently developed tool for mapping change in surface area. We examined cortical atrophy over 2 years in cognitively normal subjects and subjects with diagnoses of stable mild cognitive impairment, mild cognitive impairment that converted to AD, and AD. Magnetic resonance imaging scans were segmented and registered to a common atlas using previously described techniques (FreeSurfer and ciftify), then longitudinally registered with aMSM. Changes in cortical thickness, surface area, and volume were mapped within each diagnostic group, and groups were compared statistically. Changes in thickness and surface area detected atrophy at similar levels of significance, though regions of atrophy somewhat differed. Furthermore, we found that surface area maps offered greater consistency across scanners (3.0 vs. 1.5 T). Comparisons to the FreeSurfer longitudinal pipeline and parcellation-based (region-of-interest) analysis suggest that aMSM may allow more robust detection of atrophy, particularly in earlier disease stages and using smaller sample sizes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".