MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3162746084 · doi:10.1109/tec.2021.3079400

Small Modular Reactor (SMR) Based Hybrid Energy System for Electricity & District Heating

2021· article· en· W3162746084 on OpenAlexafffund
Bikash Poudel, Ramakrishna Gokaraju

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIntegrated Energy Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsModular designNuclear engineeringElectricityEnvironmental scienceWaste managementAutomotive engineeringElectrical engineeringEngineeringComputer scienceOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hybrid energy systems with small modular reactors (SMRs)—a fast-emerging nuclear power plant technology—and renewables hold significant promise for the development of clean energy systems. This paper proposes a simulation model of SMR-based hybrid energy system for electricity and district heating (DH) with a detailed dynamic model of the reactor and a quasi-static model of the DH system in Siemens PTI PSS/E and PSS/Sincal. A multi-timescale approach, separating the load following and frequency regulation operation, is proposed to assess the flexible operation in the presence of highly intermittent renewable energy sources (RESs). A portion of a modified IEEE 30-bus system network is used as a test system for an isolated community to simulate the proposed hybrid energy system, and comparative results demonstrate the potential benefits of the DH system, thermal energy storage, and electrical energy storage to the SMR’s flexible operation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Energy ConversionSame topicIntegrated Energy Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207