MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3162759617 · doi:10.1177/00218286211013202

Maurolico, Rheticus, and the Birth of the Secant Function

2021· article· en· W3162759617 on OpenAlexaff
Glen Van Brummelen, James Steven Byrne

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal for the History of Astronomy · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicHistory and Theory of Mathematics
Canadian institutionsQuest University CanadaTrinity Western UniversityWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTable (database)Function (biology)TrigonometrySet (abstract data type)MathematicsCalculus (dental)Computer scienceMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 1551, Georg Rheticus published a compact set of tables that effectively completed the set of all six trigonometric functions. However, his work was not widespread, and may not have been known to Francesco Maurolico when he published a secant table in 1558. Before the end of the century, several authors argued whether Maurolico had borrowed the notion of the secant, and his table, from Rheticus. We present Maurolico’s text on his table (named the tabula benefica in a nod to Regiomontanus’s tangent table, the tabula foecunda), as well as a translation and analysis. Finally, we demonstrate that Maurolico’s table is too accurate to have derived from Rheticus’s work, absolving him of the historical accusation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.747
Threshold uncertainty score0.241

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal for the History of AstronomySame topicHistory and Theory of MathematicsFrench-language works237,207