Partition function and thermodynamic quantities with atomic data of Ag XLIV
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work, the atomic parameters of Ag XLIV (Be-like Ag) are examined and evaluated by implementing the GRASP2K package with the multi-configuration Dirac–Hartree–Fock (MCDHF) method for the calculation of wave-functions. We have listed fine structure energy levels of the lowest 170 levels with radiative data for multipole moments, such as electric dipole (E1), electric quadrupole (E2), magnetic dipole (M1), and magnetic quadrupole (M2) transitions, that lie in the region of extreme ultraviolet (EUV) and soft X-ray (SXR) for Ag XLIV from the ground state within the lowest 170 levels. We have compared our GRASP2K and FAC results with theoretical results available in the literature for some levels. Additionally, we have also calculated partition function and thermodynamic quantities for temperature ranges from 104 to 107 K. We believe that our presented details and data may be beneficial not only in plasma modeling but also in imaging of nanostructure as well as in medicine, semiconductors, and EUV and SXR laser applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".