MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3162804389 · doi:10.14740/wjon1380

Primary Ewing Sarcoma of the Stomach

2021· article· en· W3162804389 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kenan Hallon, Subhi Mansour, Mira Damouny, Amir Farah, Miriam Obeid, Rozan Marjiyeh, Jawad Ghalia, Safi Khuri

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Oncology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStomachPrimary (astronomy)SarcomaEwing's sarcomaSurgeryOncologyInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To the EditorEwing sarcoma (ES), a malignant tumor of small round blue cells, arises usually in skeletal tissues and lacks neuroectodermal differentiation [1].It was reported firstly by James Ewing in 1921.Although previously regarded as a separate entity from primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET), which exhibits neuroectodermal features, nowadays, they are treated as the same tumor due to the similarity in chromosomal translocation and immunohistochemical characteristics [1].These tumors belong to the ES family of tumors which include skeletal ES/ PNET, extraskeletal ES/PNET and Askin tumor (thoracopulmonary PNET).These tumors originate from distinctive mesenchymal progenitor cells due to their similar histologic and immunohistochemical characteristics.ES is a highly metastatic type of sarcoma and represents almost 10-15% of bone sarcomas, and is regarded as the second most common primary malignant bone tumor [2].Although 5-year survival and overall survival have been improved significantly recently, the recurrence rate of such tumors remains high.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of OncologySame topicSarcoma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207